Way2Drug Projects hERG-Pred
Way2Drug helps to understand in silico in Drug Discovery

hERG-Pred

is web application for in silico prediction of hERG potassium channel blocking activity, combining both qualitative (SAR) and quantitative (QSAR) models within a single interface.

The hERG channel is one of the most critical antitargets in drug development. Blocking it disrupts myocardial repolarization, prolonging the QT interval and potentially causing life-threatening arrhythmias such as Torsades de Pointes and sudden cardiac death. Because experimental hERG testing is mandatory for any new drug candidate, computational pre-screening tools like hERG-Pred help reduce time and cost at early development stages.

How It Works?

The service is built on five (Q)SAR models developed with GUSAR software, trained on data from ChEMBL database (ver. 24):

Two QSAR models for quantitative prediction of pIC50 and pKi values (trained on 4,903 and 1,153 compounds with exact values, respectively);

Three SAR models for qualitative classification (active/inactive hERG blocker) based on IC50, Ki, and inhibition % endpoints;

Structural similarity search using the JS molecular editor, supporting SMILES, MOL, and SDF inputs - similarity is computed via MNA (Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms) and QNA (Quantitative Neighborhoods of Atoms) descriptors with Tanimoto and Todeschini coefficients.

service details

A key innovation of hERG-Pred is its use of both exact and inexact experimental values (those reported as >, <, ≥, ≤ a threshold) in SAR model training. This increased the IC50 training set by 50% and improved both prediction accuracy and applicability domain coverage.

Predictive Performance

Model type Endpoint Key metric (5-fold CV) Applicability domain
QSAR pIC50 R2 = 0.551,
RMSE = 0.602
97.9%
QSAR pKi R2 = 0.574,
RMSE = 0.608
97.9%
SAR IC50 (exact+inexact) BA = 0.816 99.9%
SAR Ki (exact+inexact) BA = 0.787 100%
SAR Inhibition % BA = 0.771 100%

All models were validated by 5-fold cross-validation, and more than 97% of compounds fell within the applicability domain.

The web service accepts compound structures in multiple formats: SMILES strings, drug names, MOL/SDF files, or structures drawn interactively via the embedded JSME Applet. Results include:

Qualitative classification (blocker / non-blocker) from all three SAR models;

Quantitative predicted pIC50 and pKi values with applicability domain flags;

Downloadable output in PDF, CSV, and Excel formats, with clipboard copy support.

Practical Use

hERG-Pred is designed for use at early stages of drug discovery, when experimental cardiac safety data is not yet available. A researcher can submit a single compound or a small library of drug candidates as SMILES strings, drawn structures, or molfiles, and receive an immediate multi-model assessment of hERG blocking risk. The simultaneous output of qualitative classification (active/inactive across three endpoints) and quantitative potency estimates (pIC50, pKi) enables a tiered decision: compounds flagged as active by multiple SAR models and showing pIC50 or pKi > 6 should be prioritized for experimental hERG patch-clamp assays, while compounds predicted inactive across all models with high applicability domain coverage can proceed with greater confidence.

Other services that might interest you:

Why hERG-Pred might be useful for you?

Early cardiac risk flagging - screen novel drug candidates for potential QT-prolongation liability before committing resources to synthesis or in vitro assays, reducing late-stage attrition caused by cardiotoxicity.

Multi-endpoint coverage - unlike most freely available tools that rely solely on IC50-based classification, hERG-Pred simultaneously provides two quantitative (pIC50, pKi) and three qualitative (IC50, Ki, Inhibition %) predictions, offering a more complete picture of hERG interaction risk.

Large, diverse applicability domain - models trained on over 10,000 curated ChEMBL structures with both exact and inexact experimental values achieve near-complete applicability domain coverage (up to 100%), meaning the tool is applicable to a broad range of organic scaffolds encountered in medicinal chemistry programs.

Which publication describes this service and how should it be cited?

In the process of publication...

What to do if I have a large dataset?

If you need to evaluate a large dataset, or if you need to maintain confidentiality of structural formulas transmitted via unsecured data channels, you can contact us to discuss the licensing opportunities.